SalariesByCity
Nurse Practitioner · Salary Comparison · 2026

Nurse Practitioner Salary: Los Angeles, CA vs San Francisco, CA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Nurse Practitioners in Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
San Francisco, CA
$140,000 vs $155,000
Better Purchasing Power
San Francisco, CA
$80,925 vs $83,333
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
San Francisco, CA
$67,821 vs $69,839
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CASan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$140,000$155,000-$15,000
25th Percentile$108,000$120,000-$12,000
75th Percentile$179,000$198,000-$19,000
90th Percentile$217,000$240,000-$23,000
Cost of Living Index173186-13
State Income Tax9.3%9.3%
COL-Adjusted Median$80,925$83,333-$2,408
Est. Annual Take-Home$117,330$129,901-$12,571
COL-Adj. Take-Home$67,821$69,839-$2,018
Total Employment14,0005,000+9,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Los Angeles, CA minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $15,000 more (median: $140,000 vs $155,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 173 vs 186), San Francisco, CA provides better purchasing power ($80,925 vs $83,333 equivalent). San Francisco, CA has the lower state tax rate (9.3% vs 9.3%).

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.