SalariesByCity
Radiologic Technologist · Salary Comparison · 2026

Radiologic Technologist Salary: Salt Lake City, UT vs San Francisco, CA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Radiologic Technologists in Salt Lake City, UT and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
San Francisco, CA
$50,000 vs $74,000
Better Purchasing Power
Salt Lake City, UT
$44,643 vs $39,785
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Salt Lake City, UT
$39,332 vs $33,342
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricSalt Lake City, UTSan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$50,000$74,000-$24,000
25th Percentile$38,500$56,980-$18,480
75th Percentile$64,000$94,720-$30,720
90th Percentile$80,000$118,400-$38,400
Cost of Living Index112186-74
State Income Tax4.65%9.3%-4.65%
COL-Adjusted Median$44,643$39,785+$4,858
Est. Annual Take-Home$44,052$62,017-$17,965
COL-Adj. Take-Home$39,332$33,342+$5,990
Total Employment45,000130,000-85,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Salt Lake City, UT minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $24,000 more (median: $50,000 vs $74,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 112 vs 186), Salt Lake City, UT provides better purchasing power ($44,643 vs $39,785 equivalent). Salt Lake City, UT has the lower state tax rate (4.65% vs 9.3%).

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.