Radiologic Technologist · Salary Comparison · 2026
Radiologic Technologist Salary: Los Angeles, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Radiologic Technologists in Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.
1Which City Pays More After Tax?
Higher Gross Salary
✓ San Francisco, CA
$63,000 vs $74,000
Better Purchasing Power
✓ San Francisco, CA
$36,416 vs $39,785
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
✓ San Francisco, CA
$30,519 vs $33,342
2
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Los Angeles, CA | San Francisco, CA | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Annual Salary | $63,000 | $74,000▲ | -$11,000 |
| 25th Percentile | $48,510 | $56,980▲ | -$8,470 |
| 75th Percentile | $80,640 | $94,720▲ | -$14,080 |
| 90th Percentile | $100,800 | $118,400▲ | -$17,600 |
| Cost of Living Index | 173 | 186 | -13 |
| State Income Tax | 9.3%▲ | 9.3% | — |
| COL-Adjusted Median | $36,416 | $39,785▲ | -$3,369 |
| Est. Annual Take-Home | $52,798 | $62,017▲ | -$9,219 |
| COL-Adj. Take-Home | $30,519 | $33,342▲ | -$2,823 |
| Total Employment | 120,000 | 130,000 | -10,000 |
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Los Angeles, CA minus San Francisco, CA.
3Summary Analysis
On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $11,000 more (median: $63,000 vs $74,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 173 vs 186), San Francisco, CA provides better purchasing power ($36,416 vs $39,785 equivalent). San Francisco, CA has the lower state tax rate (9.3% vs 9.3%).
Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.