Radiologic Technologist Salary: Columbus, OH vs San Francisco, CA
BLS reports this occupation as "Radiologic Technologists and Technicians" (29-2034); every figure on this page is for that BLS occupation.
Side-by-side comparison of wages and local price levels for Radiologic Technologists in Columbus, OH and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS May 2025 wage data and BEA regional price parities for 2024.
1Which City Pays More?
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Columbus, OH | San Francisco, CA | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Annual Salary | $80,200 | $141,780▲ | -$61,580 |
| 25th Percentile | $65,780 | $118,460▲ | -$52,680 |
| 75th Percentile | $91,860 | $169,610▲ | -$77,750 |
| 90th Percentile | $100,710 | $176,800▲ | -$76,090 |
| Price Level (BEA 2024, US = 100) | 95.5 | 115.6 | -20.1 |
| Median at National-Average Prices | $84,006 | $122,633▲ | -$38,627 |
| Total Employment | 1,780 | 2,850 | -1,070 |
3Summary Analysis
On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $61,580 more (median: $80,200 vs $141,780). BEA's regional price parity is 95.5 in Columbus, OH and 115.6 in San Francisco, CA (United States = 100). At national-average prices the medians are $84,006 and $122,633, so San Francisco, CA comes out ahead once local prices are counted.
5Reading This Comparison
The $61,580 gap between the two medians is a gap in dollars, not in what those dollars buy. Dividing each median by its area's regional price parity restates it at national-average prices: $84,006 for Columbus and $122,633 for San Francisco, a difference of $38,627.
The price levels come from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, which describes them this way: “Regional price parities (RPPs) measure the differences in price levels across states and metropolitan areas for a given year and are expressed as a percentage of the overall national price level.” The figures used here are the all-items index for each whole metropolitan area (Columbus, OH; San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA) and cover prices only, not taxes.
BLS estimates 1,780 Radiologic Technologist jobs in the Columbus area and 2,850 in the San Francisco area. For broader context, see our Ohio overview and the full Radiologic Technologist city ranking.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Radiologic Technologist salary higher in Columbus, OH or San Francisco, CA?
San Francisco, CA has the higher median wage for Radiologic Technologists ($141,780 per year, against $80,200 in Columbus, OH; BLS OEWS May 2025). Restated at national-average prices using BEA regional price parities, the medians are $84,006 in Columbus, OH and $122,633 in San Francisco, CA.
How do prices compare between Columbus, OH and San Francisco, CA?
The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis puts the 2024 regional price parity at 95.5 for the Columbus, OH metropolitan area and 115.6 for the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA metropolitan area, where the United States is 100. That is 4.5% below the national level for Columbus, OH and 15.6% above the national level for San Francisco, CA.
Which city pays Radiologic Technologists more once local prices are counted?
San Francisco, CA: at national-average prices its median Radiologic Technologist wage is $122,633, against $84,006 for Columbus, OH. The adjustment divides each median by the area's BEA regional price parity and covers prices only, not taxes.