SalariesByCity
Radiologic Technologist · Salary Comparison · 2026

Radiologic Technologist Salary: Columbus, OH vs San Francisco, CA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Radiologic Technologists in Columbus, OH and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
San Francisco, CA
$47,000 vs $74,000
Better Purchasing Power
Columbus, OH
$51,648 vs $39,785
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Columbus, OH
$45,819 vs $33,342
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricColumbus, OHSan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$47,000$74,000-$27,000
25th Percentile$36,190$56,980-$20,790
75th Percentile$60,160$94,720-$34,560
90th Percentile$75,200$118,400-$43,200
Cost of Living Index91186-95
State Income Tax3.99%9.3%-5.3100000000000005%
COL-Adjusted Median$51,648$39,785+$11,863
Est. Annual Take-Home$41,695$62,017-$20,322
COL-Adj. Take-Home$45,819$33,342+$12,477
Total Employment40,000130,000-90,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Columbus, OH minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $27,000 more (median: $47,000 vs $74,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 91 vs 186), Columbus, OH provides better purchasing power ($51,648 vs $39,785 equivalent). Columbus, OH has the lower state tax rate (3.99% vs 9.3%).

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.