SalariesByCity
Radiologic Technologist · Salary Comparison · 2026

Radiologic Technologist Salary: Boston, MA vs San Francisco, CA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Radiologic Technologists in Boston, MA and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
San Francisco, CA
$65,000 vs $74,000
Better Purchasing Power
Boston, MA
$40,123 vs $39,785
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Boston, MA
$35,220 vs $33,342
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricBoston, MASan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$65,000$74,000-$9,000
25th Percentile$50,050$56,980-$6,930
75th Percentile$83,200$94,720-$11,520
90th Percentile$104,000$118,400-$14,400
Cost of Living Index162186-24
State Income Tax5%9.3%-4.300000000000001%
COL-Adjusted Median$40,123$39,785+$338
Est. Annual Take-Home$57,057$62,017-$4,960
COL-Adj. Take-Home$35,220$33,342+$1,878
Total Employment105,000130,000-25,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Boston, MA minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $9,000 more (median: $65,000 vs $74,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 162 vs 186), Boston, MA provides better purchasing power ($40,123 vs $39,785 equivalent). Boston, MA has the lower state tax rate (5% vs 9.3%).

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.