SalariesByCity
Investment Banker · Salary Comparison · 2026

Investment Banker Salary: Los Angeles, CA vs Austin, TX

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Investment Bankers in Los Angeles, CA and Austin, TX, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
Los Angeles, CA
$165,000 vs $154,000
Better Purchasing Power
Austin, TX
$95,376 vs $124,194
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Austin, TX
$79,931 vs $114,755
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CAAustin, TXDiff
Median Annual Salary$165,000$154,000+$11,000
25th Percentile$127,050$118,580+$8,470
75th Percentile$211,200$197,120+$14,080
90th Percentile$264,000$246,400+$17,600
Cost of Living Index173124+49
State Income Tax9.3%0%+9.3%
COL-Adjusted Median$95,376$124,194-$28,818
Est. Annual Take-Home$138,281$142,296-$4,015
COL-Adj. Take-Home$79,931$114,755-$34,824
Total Employment38,40030,400+8,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Los Angeles, CA minus Austin, TX.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, Los Angeles, CA pays $11,000 more (median: $165,000 vs $154,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 173 vs 124), Austin, TX provides better purchasing power ($95,376 vs $124,194 equivalent). Austin, TX has no state income tax, which is a significant advantage.

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.