SalariesByCity
Financial Analyst · Salary Comparison · 2026

Financial Analyst Salary: Los Angeles, CA vs San Francisco, CA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Financial Analysts in Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
San Francisco, CA
$105,000 vs $112,000
Better Purchasing Power
Los Angeles, CA
$60,694 vs $60,215
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Los Angeles, CA
$50,865 vs $50,465
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CASan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$105,000$112,000-$7,000
25th Percentile$78,000$82,000-$4,000
75th Percentile$138,000$148,000-$10,000
90th Percentile$177,000$190,000-$13,000
Cost of Living Index173186-13
State Income Tax9.3%9.3%
COL-Adjusted Median$60,694$60,215+$479
Est. Annual Take-Home$87,997$93,864-$5,867
COL-Adj. Take-Home$50,865$50,465+$400
Total Employment20,00014,000+6,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Los Angeles, CA minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $7,000 more (median: $105,000 vs $112,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 173 vs 186), Los Angeles, CA provides better purchasing power ($60,694 vs $60,215 equivalent). San Francisco, CA has the lower state tax rate (9.3% vs 9.3%).

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.