SalariesByCity
Financial Analyst · Salary Comparison · BLS OEWS May 2025

Financial Analyst Salary: Los Angeles, CA vs San Francisco, CA

BLS reports this occupation as "Financial and Investment Analysts" (13-2051); every figure on this page is for that BLS occupation.

Side-by-side comparison of wages and local price levels for Financial Analysts in Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS May 2025 wage data and BEA regional price parities for 2024.

1Which City Pays More?

Higher Median Wage
✓ San Francisco, CA
$102,260 vs $130,520
Higher at National-Average Prices
✓ San Francisco, CA
$90,045 vs $112,894
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CASan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$102,260$130,520▲-$28,260
25th Percentile$82,990$97,490▲-$14,500
75th Percentile$134,150$166,350▲-$32,200
90th Percentile$181,190$217,160▲-$35,970
Price Level (BEA 2024, US = 100)113.6115.6-2.0
Median at National-Average Prices$90,045$112,894▲-$22,849
Total Employment19,6009,910+9,690
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Los Angeles, CA minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $28,260 more (median: $102,260 vs $130,520). BEA's regional price parity is 113.6 in Los Angeles, CA and 115.6 in San Francisco, CA (United States = 100). At national-average prices the medians are $90,045 and $112,894, so San Francisco, CA comes out ahead once local prices are counted.

5Reading This Comparison

The $28,260 gap between the two medians is a gap in dollars, not in what those dollars buy. Dividing each median by its area's regional price parity restates it at national-average prices: $90,045 for Los Angeles and $112,894 for San Francisco, a difference of $22,849.

The price levels come from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, which describes them this way: “Regional price parities (RPPs) measure the differences in price levels across states and metropolitan areas for a given year and are expressed as a percentage of the overall national price level.” The figures used here are the all-items index for each whole metropolitan area (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA; San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA) and cover prices only, not taxes.

BLS estimates 19,600 Financial Analyst jobs in the Los Angeles area and 9,910 in the San Francisco area. For broader context, see our California overview and the full Financial Analyst city ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Financial Analyst salary higher in Los Angeles, CA or San Francisco, CA?

San Francisco, CA has the higher median wage for Financial Analysts ($130,520 per year, against $102,260 in Los Angeles, CA; BLS OEWS May 2025). Restated at national-average prices using BEA regional price parities, the medians are $90,045 in Los Angeles, CA and $112,894 in San Francisco, CA.

How do prices compare between Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA?

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis puts the 2024 regional price parity at 113.6 for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metropolitan area and 115.6 for the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA metropolitan area, where the United States is 100. That is 13.6% above the national level for Los Angeles, CA and 15.6% above the national level for San Francisco, CA.

Which city pays Financial Analysts more once local prices are counted?

San Francisco, CA: at national-average prices its median Financial Analyst wage is $112,894, against $90,045 for Los Angeles, CA. The adjustment divides each median by the area's BEA regional price parity and covers prices only, not taxes.

Wages and employment: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, OEWS May 2025. Price levels: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, regional price parities (all items) for 2024, tables last updated February 19, 2026.