Financial Analyst Salary: Los Angeles, CA vs Austin, TX
BLS reports this occupation as "Financial and Investment Analysts" (13-2051); every figure on this page is for that BLS occupation.
Side-by-side comparison of wages and local price levels for Financial Analysts in Los Angeles, CA and Austin, TX, based on BLS OEWS May 2025 wage data and BEA regional price parities for 2024.
1Which City Pays More?
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Los Angeles, CA | Austin, TX | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Annual Salary | $102,260▲ | $101,530 | +$730 |
| 25th Percentile | $82,990▲ | $80,040 | +$2,950 |
| 75th Percentile | $134,150▲ | $132,060 | +$2,090 |
| 90th Percentile | $181,190 | $189,180▲ | -$7,990 |
| Price Level (BEA 2024, US = 100) | 113.6 | 98.1 | +15.5 |
| Median at National-Average Prices | $90,045 | $103,532▲ | -$13,487 |
| Total Employment | 19,600 | 3,530 | +16,070 |
3Summary Analysis
On paper, Los Angeles, CA pays $730 more (median: $102,260 vs $101,530). BEA's regional price parity is 113.6 in Los Angeles, CA and 98.1 in Austin, TX (United States = 100). At national-average prices the medians are $90,045 and $103,532, so Austin, TX comes out ahead once local prices are counted.
4More Financial Analyst City Comparisons
5Reading This Comparison
The $730 gap between the two medians is a gap in dollars, not in what those dollars buy. Dividing each median by its area's regional price parity restates it at national-average prices: $90,045 for Los Angeles and $103,532 for Austin, a difference of $13,487.
The price levels come from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, which describes them this way: “Regional price parities (RPPs) measure the differences in price levels across states and metropolitan areas for a given year and are expressed as a percentage of the overall national price level.” The figures used here are the all-items index for each whole metropolitan area (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA; Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX) and cover prices only, not taxes.
BLS estimates 19,600 Financial Analyst jobs in the Los Angeles area and 3,530 in the Austin area. For broader context, see our California overview and the full Financial Analyst city ranking.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Financial Analyst salary higher in Los Angeles, CA or Austin, TX?
Los Angeles, CA has the higher median wage for Financial Analysts ($102,260 per year, against $101,530 in Austin, TX; BLS OEWS May 2025). Restated at national-average prices using BEA regional price parities, the medians are $90,045 in Los Angeles, CA and $103,532 in Austin, TX.
How do prices compare between Los Angeles, CA and Austin, TX?
The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis puts the 2024 regional price parity at 113.6 for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metropolitan area and 98.1 for the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area, where the United States is 100. That is 13.6% above the national level for Los Angeles, CA and 1.9% below the national level for Austin, TX.
Which city pays Financial Analysts more once local prices are counted?
Austin, TX: at national-average prices its median Financial Analyst wage is $103,532, against $90,045 for Los Angeles, CA. The adjustment divides each median by the area's BEA regional price parity and covers prices only, not taxes.