SalariesByCity
Financial Advisor · Salary Comparison · 2026

Financial Advisor Salary: Chicago, IL vs Boston, MA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Financial Advisors in Chicago, IL and Boston, MA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
Boston, MA
$92,000 vs $112,000
Better Purchasing Power
Chicago, IL
$85,981 vs $69,136
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Chicago, IL
$75,514 vs $60,688
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricChicago, ILBoston, MADiff
Median Annual Salary$92,000$112,000-$20,000
25th Percentile$70,840$86,240-$15,400
75th Percentile$117,760$143,360-$25,600
90th Percentile$147,200$179,200-$32,000
Cost of Living Index107162-55
State Income Tax4.95%5%-0.04999999999999982%
COL-Adjusted Median$85,981$69,136+$16,845
Est. Annual Take-Home$80,800$98,314-$17,514
COL-Adj. Take-Home$75,514$60,688+$14,826
Total Employment28,00033,600-5,600
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Chicago, IL minus Boston, MA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, Boston, MA pays $20,000 more (median: $92,000 vs $112,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 107 vs 162), Chicago, IL provides better purchasing power ($85,981 vs $69,136 equivalent). Chicago, IL has the lower state tax rate (4.95% vs 5%).

5How to Weigh This Comparison

The $20,000 nominal pay gap between Chicago, IL and Boston, MA is the wrong number to focus on in isolation. Cost-of-living indices of 107 and 162 mean the same paycheck stretches very differently in each market. The COL-adjusted figures above — $85,981 in Chicago vs $69,136 in Boston— are the closest proxy for "how much will your money actually buy." A meaningful gap of $16,845 on that axis usually beats any nominal salary difference.

Housing is the single biggest driver of cost-of-living differences. In Boston, MA, expect housing to consume a larger share of gross income than in Chicago, IL. If you're planning to rent, the COL index is a reasonable proxy for rent differences. If you're buying, expect purchase price differences to be sharper than the composite index suggests — housing tends to be the most inelastic component of cost of living.

Tax treatment matters but is usually smaller than COL impact. The 0.0% state tax rate difference (4.95% in Illinois vs 5% in Massachusetts) translates to roughly $56 per year at these salary levels. States with no income tax (Texas, Florida, Washington, Nevada, Tennessee) often offset with higher property tax or sales tax, so factor in your housing and consumption patterns.

Career factors that don't show up in these numbers: total employment (with 28,000 positions in Chicago vs 33,600 in Boston, the larger market offers more lateral moves and promotion paths), industry concentration (tech-heavy cities like San Francisco, Seattle, Austin pay premiums for engineering roles but may underpay other occupations), and 3–5 year career trajectory (year-over-year employment growth of 3.1% in Chicago vs 4.1% in Boston reveals whether each market is expanding or contracting). For a broader context, see our Illinois overview and the full Financial Advisor city ranking.

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.