SalariesByCity
Business Analyst · Salary Comparison · 2026

Business Analyst Salary: Boston, MA vs Seattle, WA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Business Analysts in Boston, MA and Seattle, WA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
Seattle, WA
$105,000 vs $116,000
Better Purchasing Power
Seattle, WA
$64,815 vs $71,605
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Seattle, WA
$56,894 vs $66,163
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricBoston, MASeattle, WADiff
Median Annual Salary$105,000$116,000-$11,000
25th Percentile$80,850$89,320-$8,470
75th Percentile$134,400$148,480-$14,080
90th Percentile$168,000$185,600-$17,600
Cost of Living Index162162
State Income Tax5%0%+5%
COL-Adjusted Median$64,815$71,605-$6,790
Est. Annual Take-Home$92,169$107,184-$15,015
COL-Adj. Take-Home$56,894$66,163-$9,269
Total Employment63,00087,000-24,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Boston, MA minus Seattle, WA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, Seattle, WA pays $11,000 more (median: $105,000 vs $116,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 162 vs 162), Seattle, WA provides better purchasing power ($64,815 vs $71,605 equivalent). Seattle, WA has no state income tax, which is a significant advantage.

5How to Weigh This Comparison

The $11,000 nominal pay gap between Boston, MA and Seattle, WA is the wrong number to focus on in isolation. Cost-of-living indices of 162 and 162 mean the same paycheck stretches very differently in each market. The COL-adjusted figures above — $64,815 in Boston vs $71,605 in Seattle— are the closest proxy for "how much will your money actually buy." A meaningful gap of $6,790 on that axis usually beats any nominal salary difference.

Housing is the single biggest driver of cost-of-living differences. In Seattle, WA, expect housing to consume a larger share of gross income than in Boston, MA. If you're planning to rent, the COL index is a reasonable proxy for rent differences. If you're buying, expect purchase price differences to be sharper than the composite index suggests — housing tends to be the most inelastic component of cost of living.

Tax treatment matters but is usually smaller than COL impact. The 5.0% state tax rate difference (5% in Massachusetts vs 0% in Washington) translates to roughly $5,800 per year at these salary levels. States with no income tax (Texas, Florida, Washington, Nevada, Tennessee) often offset with higher property tax or sales tax, so factor in your housing and consumption patterns.

Career factors that don't show up in these numbers: total employment (with 63,000 positions in Boston vs 87,000 in Seattle, the larger market offers more lateral moves and promotion paths), industry concentration (tech-heavy cities like San Francisco, Seattle, Austin pay premiums for engineering roles but may underpay other occupations), and 3–5 year career trajectory (year-over-year employment growth of 4.1% in Boston vs 5.1% in Seattle reveals whether each market is expanding or contracting). For a broader context, see our Massachusetts overview and the full Business Analyst city ranking.

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.