SalariesByCity
Radiologic Technologist · Salary Comparison · 2026

Radiologic Technologist Salary: Raleigh, NC vs San Francisco, CA

Side-by-side comparison of salary, taxes, cost of living, and take-home pay for Radiologic Technologists in Raleigh, NC and San Francisco, CA, based on BLS OEWS 2026 data.

1Which City Pays More After Tax?

Higher Gross Salary
San Francisco, CA
$53,000 vs $74,000
Better Purchasing Power
Raleigh, NC
$51,456 vs $39,785
Best Take-Home (COL-Adj)
Raleigh, NC
$45,406 vs $33,342
2

Detailed Comparison

MetricRaleigh, NCSan Francisco, CADiff
Median Annual Salary$53,000$74,000-$21,000
25th Percentile$40,810$56,980-$16,170
75th Percentile$67,840$94,720-$26,880
90th Percentile$84,800$118,400-$33,600
Cost of Living Index103186-83
State Income Tax4.5%9.3%-4.800000000000001%
COL-Adjusted Median$51,456$39,785+$11,671
Est. Annual Take-Home$46,768$62,017-$15,249
COL-Adj. Take-Home$45,406$33,342+$12,064
Total Employment55,000130,000-75,000
▲ = Higher value wins for this metric. Diff = Raleigh, NC minus San Francisco, CA.

3Summary Analysis

On paper, San Francisco, CA pays $21,000 more (median: $53,000 vs $74,000). However, after adjusting for cost of living (index 103 vs 186), Raleigh, NC provides better purchasing power ($51,456 vs $39,785 equivalent). Raleigh, NC has the lower state tax rate (4.5% vs 9.3%).

Data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS · 2026 · Cost-of-living indices from composite metro area data. Take-home estimates approximate only — consult a tax professional for accurate figures.